Prakash Raj Faces Legal Complaint in Tirupati Over Controversial Ramayana Remarks
A Tirupati court has received a criminal complaint against actor Prakash Raj for his controversial remarks on the Ramayana. BJP leader G. Bhanuprakash Reddy filed the case, alleging that the actor's comments insulted Hindu sentiments and threatened to disrupt communal harmony.

Highlights
- •BJP leader G. Bhanuprakash Reddy filed a criminal complaint against Prakash Raj in a Tirupati court.
- •The complaint concerns controversial remarks made by the actor about the Ramayana during a literature festival.
- •Petitioner alleges the actor's comments insulted Hindu deities and could incite regional and communal division.
- •Legal action is being sought under the provisions of the BNS following previous ignored complaints.
A formal criminal complaint has been filed against prominent actor Prakash Raj in a Tirupati court, following controversial remarks he made regarding the Ramayana. The legal action centers on accusations that the actor’s comments about Hindu deities and epic narratives were intentionally offensive, causing deep hurt to the religious sentiments of the Hindu community.
G. Bhanuprakash Reddy, a senior BJP leader, officially submitted the petition to the IV-additional judicial magistrate on Monday. The complainant is seeking appropriate legal intervention under the relevant sections of the BNS. This filing follows earlier, unsuccessful attempts by the petitioner to resolve the matter through formal legal notices and police complaints lodged within the Tirupati jurisdiction.
Details of the Legal Complaint Against Prakash Raj
The controversy stems from statements reportedly made by Prakash Raj during his appearance at the Kerala Literature Festival, which took place in January. According to the court petition, video clips featuring the actor’s commentary on specific incidents from the Ramayana—particularly involving the journey of Lord Rama and Lakshmana toward Lanka—subsequently gained widespread attention across various social media platforms.
The petitioner, G. Bhanuprakash Reddy, argues that the actor deliberately framed the Ramayana through an "Aryan-Dravidian" perspective. He further asserted that such interpretations are inherently divisive, potentially inciting discord among different groups based on regional and religious affiliations. According to the complaint, these statements carry the risk of undermining communal harmony and disrupting public order.
While this legal move highlights growing tensions over public discourse surrounding mythology and cultural sensitivity, the focus remains on the judicial process initiated in Tirupati. The court is expected to review the merit of the accusations as the legal proceedings move forward. The case underscores the broader implications of celebrity public statements and the legal thresholds for addressing grievances related to religious sentiments in India. As the case progresses, observers will be watching to see how the judiciary addresses the balance between freedom of expression and the preservation of communal harmony.














